We have always run into problems finding a concrete definition for humanness because one can always point to a counterexample or find another species satisfying that definition. In fact, I wonder if any definition can be thought of not based on the genetic level. What happens to our legal system when we have species and computers indistinguishable from human intelligence? What about when smarter beings come about? Will we protect only homo sapiens or will we extend rights to those entities which fit within a new definition of what we think is protectable?
I SUBMIT… the best definition for humanness is the ability to empathize. Thoughts?
1 comment:
this should all be on sleepisforpoorpeople.com . . . with that being said I will ignore that fact and contribute until that day anyways.
Post a Comment